<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GDC: Valve confirms Portal 2</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: videogaming247 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GDC: Orange Box sells well in excess of 3 million</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>videogaming247 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GDC: Orange Box sells well in excess of 3 million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>[...] was a busy time for Valve, having seemingly confirmed Portal 2, explained why Left 4 Dead won&#8217;t be coming to PS3 and hinted that Wii development may be a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was a busy time for Valve, having seemingly confirmed Portal 2, explained why Left 4 Dead won&#8217;t be coming to PS3 and hinted that Wii development may be a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>They really have failed. I'll go next year with my camera of power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They really have failed. I&#8217;ll go next year with my camera of power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>*Still* no Kim Swift pictures!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Still* no Kim Swift pictures!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrDamn</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>DrDamn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. I loved Portal, but I think the size was as far as they could go with it sensibly without retreading old ground. It was part of the well roundedness of the title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. I loved Portal, but I think the size was as far as they could go with it sensibly without retreading old ground. It was part of the well roundedness of the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>Be very interesting to see what they do with this. I think a lot of the appeal of Portal is that it was short and easy to complete, and what was there was highly polished. I reckon they may keep it to a similar play-time, you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be very interesting to see what they do with this. I think a lot of the appeal of Portal is that it was short and easy to complete, and what was there was highly polished. I reckon they may keep it to a similar play-time, you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ran93r</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>ran93r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-valve-confirms-portal-2/#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>I would easily pay for a nice, big, full price monster of a Portal. Perhaps a little more variety than new levels but anything is better than nowt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would easily pay for a nice, big, full price monster of a Portal. Perhaps a little more variety than new levels but anything is better than nowt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
