<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony dates MGS4 bundle as &#8220;late Q2 2008&#8243;</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/27/sony-dates-mgs4-bundle-as-late-q2-2008/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/27/sony-dates-mgs4-bundle-as-late-q2-2008/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/27/sony-dates-mgs4-bundle-as-late-q2-2008/#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>It may well hit Japan a few weeks early. I'm not surprised that they're being touchy about announcing firm dates. Doing a global launch of something as big as this is a little "tricky".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may well hit Japan a few weeks early. I&#8217;m not surprised that they&#8217;re being touchy about announcing firm dates. Doing a global launch of something as big as this is a little &#8220;tricky&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/27/sony-dates-mgs4-bundle-as-late-q2-2008/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/27/sony-dates-mgs4-bundle-as-late-q2-2008/#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>June 12th is the date which appears in this week's Famitsu, the first time it's been listed as far as I'm aware.

They're probably being cagey in case there's slippage and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June 12th is the date which appears in this week&#8217;s Famitsu, the first time it&#8217;s been listed as far as I&#8217;m aware.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re probably being cagey in case there&#8217;s slippage and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
