<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take-Two financials: &#8220;Major&#8221; Rockstar sequel for 2009</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>I'd be very surprised if that isn't going to happen before 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be very surprised if that isn&#8217;t going to happen before 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zumi</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>Zumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>Max Payne..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max Payne..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>It was the only good game at E3 that year everyone showed all their shit PS2 stuff. I'd buy a sequel, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the only good game at E3 that year everyone showed all their shit PS2 stuff. I&#8217;d buy a sequel, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMG</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>AMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>Smuggler's Run 2 was dope. Those piss-take FMV cutscenes were genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smuggler&#8217;s Run 2 was dope. Those piss-take FMV cutscenes were genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2700</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2700</guid>
		<description>I should have done a story on it, really.

Smugglers Run was ace. There you go, AMG :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have done a story on it, really.</p>
<p>Smugglers Run was ace. There you go, AMG <img src='http://www.videogaming247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pleasant_cabbage</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator>pleasant_cabbage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2699</guid>
		<description>Cheers Patlike
/considers reading news for a change before commenting

I liked smugglers run :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Patlike<br />
/considers reading news for a change before commenting</p>
<p>I liked smugglers run <img src='http://www.videogaming247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2698</guid>
		<description>@amg: You're such a fucking cynic.

I hoop its Red Dead Revolver!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@amg: You&#8217;re such a fucking cynic.</p>
<p>I hoop its Red Dead Revolver!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2697</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2697</guid>
		<description>@pleasant: Fiscal 09, I think. It's in the original statement (look on the first Bioshock 2 story)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pleasant: Fiscal 09, I think. It&#8217;s in the original statement (look on the first Bioshock 2 story)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMG</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>AMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>Red Dead Revolver was always going to be a trilogy. Or maybe Oni 2. Smuggler's Run 3! Speculate some more!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red Dead Revolver was always going to be a trilogy. Or maybe Oni 2. Smuggler&#8217;s Run 3! Speculate some more!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pleasant_cabbage</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>pleasant_cabbage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2695</guid>
		<description>has there been any news on a Midnight club next gen outing?
/may be confused</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has there been any news on a Midnight club next gen outing?<br />
/may be confused</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morriss</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>morriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't call TT2 triple A though. Still, I'd welcome another game. Thought it was a great budget title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call TT2 triple A though. Still, I&#8217;d welcome another game. Thought it was a great budget title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>That would be so cool.

I bet it's Table Tennis 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be so cool.</p>
<p>I bet it&#8217;s Table Tennis 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>They weren't working on DLC at the same time then though, were they? :-)

I'd like to see them do a proper 3D sequel to GTA London, if they're looking for ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weren&#8217;t working on DLC at the same time then though, were they? <img src='http://www.videogaming247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see them do a proper 3D sequel to GTA London, if they&#8217;re looking for ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2688</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2688</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that's true. Although if IV was finished up a few months ago (apparently it was) and the next one came out at the end of 09, that'd give them nearly two years. That said, Vice City was such a major update to GTA III, it'd be difficult to see how they could replicated that in this gen even with that much time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s true. Although if IV was finished up a few months ago (apparently it was) and the next one came out at the end of 09, that&#8217;d give them nearly two years. That said, Vice City was such a major update to GTA III, it&#8217;d be difficult to see how they could replicated that in this gen even with that much time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2687</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that'd make the most sense. I'd hope they couldn't manage something like that within a year, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;d make the most sense. I&#8217;d hope they couldn&#8217;t manage something like that within a year, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>Surely a "content sequel" on the GTA engine along the lines of Vice City would be the most obvious choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely a &#8220;content sequel&#8221; on the GTA engine along the lines of Vice City would be the most obvious choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>Bully sequel, pls. Although the GTA team didn't actually work on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bully sequel, pls. Although the GTA team didn&#8217;t actually work on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.videogaming247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morriss</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2678</link>
		<dc:creator>morriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2678</guid>
		<description>TABLE TENNIS! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TABLE TENNIS! <img src='http://www.videogaming247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2675</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2675</guid>
		<description>I'll change it to "Rockstar". I'm not sure what else it would really mean, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll change it to &#8220;Rockstar&#8221;. I&#8217;m not sure what else it would really mean, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frod</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2674</link>
		<dc:creator>frod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2674</guid>
		<description>But we haven't even got this one yet!

I find the prospect of annual GTA quite tiring :\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But we haven&#8217;t even got this one yet!</p>
<p>I find the prospect of annual GTA quite tiring :\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/12/take-two-financials-major-gta-sequel-for-2009/#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>They don't actually say it's a GTA sequel though, do they? Just 'a sequel'. It could be anything. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t actually say it&#8217;s a GTA sequel though, do they? Just &#8216;a sequel&#8217;. It could be anything. <img src='http://www.videogaming247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
