<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three expansion packs planned for N+</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/13/three-expansion-packs-planned-for-n/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/13/three-expansion-packs-planned-for-n/#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/13/three-expansion-packs-planned-for-n/#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>I'm pretty sure the original story says they're being made by the original team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the original story says they&#8217;re being made by the original team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/13/three-expansion-packs-planned-for-n/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/13/three-expansion-packs-planned-for-n/#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>Hang about. Who designed these levels? I know N+ has a large community level designing community. I find it hard to believe that the core development team has magicked up 600 levels to sell over XBLA.

The alternative suggests they may intend to profit from content they didn't create.

I wonder which is true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang about. Who designed these levels? I know N+ has a large community level designing community. I find it hard to believe that the core development team has magicked up 600 levels to sell over XBLA.</p>
<p>The alternative suggests they may intend to profit from content they didn&#8217;t create.</p>
<p>I wonder which is true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
