Comments on: NPD figures: Microsoft focuses on GTA IV and “improving” hardware stocks http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/ This is the news Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:24:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: patlike http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-3000 patlike Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:50:22 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-3000 haha Mark'd go rogue and whack Gates while he was there, leaving the way clear for Dreamcast. He'd be a double agent... IN TIME. haha

Mark’d go rogue and whack Gates while he was there, leaving the way clear for Dreamcast. He’d be a double agent… IN TIME.

]]> By: grandmaster http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2999 grandmaster Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:49:18 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2999 By sending Mark Maslowicz back through time to kill Ken Kutaragi and 'Shigsy' Miyamato. Microsoft *IS* Skynet. I just proved it. By sending Mark Maslowicz back through time to kill Ken Kutaragi and ‘Shigsy’ Miyamato.

Microsoft *IS* Skynet. I just proved it.

]]> By: patlike http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2995 patlike Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:36:05 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2995 I think it's code for, "How exactly are we going to get past 20 million?" I think it’s code for, “How exactly are we going to get past 20 million?”

]]> By: grandmaster http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2994 grandmaster Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:33:35 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2994 Why does the concept of a console 'ecosystem' scare me so much? It's only one step away from a gaming version of Skynet. Mark my words. Mark them. Why does the concept of a console ‘ecosystem’ scare me so much? It’s only one step away from a gaming version of Skynet. Mark my words. Mark them.

]]> By: patlike http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2962 patlike Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:13:42 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2962 I have absolutely no idea why they're having problems. I think it's the runover from Christmas demand. I have absolutely no idea why they’re having problems. I think it’s the runover from Christmas demand.

]]> By: Blerk http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2949 Blerk Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:08:13 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2949 Wow - just noticed that the 360's the only place I can download Hannah Montana! That's quite the USP. Wow - just noticed that the 360’s the only place I can download Hannah Montana! That’s quite the USP.

]]> By: Blerk http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2947 Blerk Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:07:37 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/14/npd-figures-microsoft-focuses-on-gta-iv-and-improving-hardware-stocks/#comment-2947 If they really are having stock problems, I wonder why? Surely they should have the world's biggest stockpiles of 360s ready for GTA time? And if not... why not? If they really are having stock problems, I wonder why? Surely they should have the world’s biggest stockpiles of 360s ready for GTA time? And if not… why not?

]]>