<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Operation Flashpoint 2 shots emerge</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/22/new-operation-flashpoint-2-shots-emerge/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lucidregalon</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/22/new-operation-flashpoint-2-shots-emerge/#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>lucidregalon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/22/new-operation-flashpoint-2-shots-emerge/#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>I'm a little scared that all the shots are of small four man teams. I'm fed up of playing GRAW and R6 and its many clones. The beauty of Op Flash 1 was attacking positions in force with a platoon. You were simply a small cog in the military machine. But after BI messed up ArmA I'm counting on this to be good.

Pat you big games journo man, I hope to be that guy who askes you industry questions, but do you have any idea whats going on with Enemy in Sight, Illusion Softworks take on OP Flash?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little scared that all the shots are of small four man teams. I&#8217;m fed up of playing GRAW and R6 and its many clones. The beauty of Op Flash 1 was attacking positions in force with a platoon. You were simply a small cog in the military machine. But after BI messed up ArmA I&#8217;m counting on this to be good.</p>
<p>Pat you big games journo man, I hope to be that guy who askes you industry questions, but do you have any idea whats going on with Enemy in Sight, Illusion Softworks take on OP Flash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiger Walts</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/22/new-operation-flashpoint-2-shots-emerge/#comment-3620</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiger Walts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/22/new-operation-flashpoint-2-shots-emerge/#comment-3620</guid>
		<description>Well, it's not BI doing this one. A pity that ArmA was it little too flakey in the AI department. I can see Codemasters tweaking a few things in the old formula to make it easier. Let's hope that doesn't compromise what made the first one great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s not BI doing this one. A pity that ArmA was it little too flakey in the AI department. I can see Codemasters tweaking a few things in the old formula to make it easier. Let&#8217;s hope that doesn&#8217;t compromise what made the first one great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/22/new-operation-flashpoint-2-shots-emerge/#comment-3614</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/22/new-operation-flashpoint-2-shots-emerge/#comment-3614</guid>
		<description>The first one was extremely hard. Can't see why this'd be any different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one was extremely hard. Can&#8217;t see why this&#8217;d be any different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Plainview</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/22/new-operation-flashpoint-2-shots-emerge/#comment-3613</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Plainview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/03/22/new-operation-flashpoint-2-shots-emerge/#comment-3613</guid>
		<description>Hopefully it's hardcore &#38;  very tactical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully it&#8217;s hardcore &amp;  very tactical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
