<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCEA: We underestimated 80Gb PS3 demand</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Killerbee</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4879</link>
		<dc:creator>Killerbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4879</guid>
		<description>Sony still don't quite get it, though, do they? Price was always the major concern of the original launch PS3s - they were far too expensive in comparison to the 360.

The problem - and the big mistake Sony made - was in thinking that a price cut could be justified by also cutting features from the console. The fact is, many people still wanted a cheaper *fully featured* PS3, not one that was cheaper but dropped stuff like PS2 backwards compatibility and doesn't have enough USB ports for Rock Band.

Anyway, the sooner this news filters through to Sony Europe, the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony still don&#8217;t quite get it, though, do they? Price was always the major concern of the original launch PS3s - they were far too expensive in comparison to the 360.</p>
<p>The problem - and the big mistake Sony made - was in thinking that a price cut could be justified by also cutting features from the console. The fact is, many people still wanted a cheaper *fully featured* PS3, not one that was cheaper but dropped stuff like PS2 backwards compatibility and doesn&#8217;t have enough USB ports for Rock Band.</p>
<p>Anyway, the sooner this news filters through to Sony Europe, the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Plainview</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4858</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Plainview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4858</guid>
		<description>@Tiger Walts: hardly.

It's very easy to upgrade, I've got a PAL launch 60gig &#38; I've never used the backwards compatibility</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tiger Walts: hardly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very easy to upgrade, I&#8217;ve got a PAL launch 60gig &amp; I&#8217;ve never used the backwards compatibility</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiger Walts</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4834</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiger Walts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4834</guid>
		<description>Hah, and Sony bods were saying the multiple 360 SKUs were confusing. You probably need a 3D Venn diagram to explain the functionality in the different PS3s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, and Sony bods were saying the multiple 360 SKUs were confusing. You probably need a 3D Venn diagram to explain the functionality in the different PS3s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4833</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4833</guid>
		<description>Never short of a coaster at morriss's house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never short of a coaster at morriss&#8217;s house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morriss</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4830</link>
		<dc:creator>morriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4830</guid>
		<description>\o/

/glares at HD-DVD collection 

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>\o/</p>
<p>/glares at HD-DVD collection </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.videogaming247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4824</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4824</guid>
		<description>Earlyadopterlol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlyadopterlol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morriss</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4821</link>
		<dc:creator>morriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4821</guid>
		<description>I'm a mug who spend £500 one year ago on the 4 USB, Back Compat Mega Pack with 1 free shit Blu Ray film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a mug who spend £500 one year ago on the 4 USB, Back Compat Mega Pack with 1 free shit Blu Ray film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epic_wanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4815</link>
		<dc:creator>epic_wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4815</guid>
		<description>Yes, we want dual shocks too.  I want a PS3 now (not for any specific games, which is why I'm willing to wait) but the fact that other parts of the world are not just getting a better deal financially but also getting a better gadget is hard to swallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we want dual shocks too.  I want a PS3 now (not for any specific games, which is why I&#8217;m willing to wait) but the fact that other parts of the world are not just getting a better deal financially but also getting a better gadget is hard to swallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4805</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4805</guid>
		<description>Come on, SCEE - give us that US MGS pack. That's all anyone's asking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, SCEE - give us that US MGS pack. That&#8217;s all anyone&#8217;s asking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>Hmm. This is true. I guess I've got a TB of PC hard disc for music, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. This is true. I guess I&#8217;ve got a TB of PC hard disc for music, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4798</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4798</guid>
		<description>Pat, I've a 40gb and, admittedly, few games but I fully intended to plonk in a HOOJ hard disk in the near future. From what I've been lead to believe it's very straightforward. After all, 80gb might not seem enough either...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, I&#8217;ve a 40gb and, admittedly, few games but I fully intended to plonk in a HOOJ hard disk in the near future. From what I&#8217;ve been lead to believe it&#8217;s very straightforward. After all, 80gb might not seem enough either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4797</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4797</guid>
		<description>The dream :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dream <img src='http://www.videogaming247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epic_wanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4796</link>
		<dc:creator>epic_wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4796</guid>
		<description>Also, "a certain customer" would prefer a PS3 with backwards compatibility (even if it is only software emulation).  If they brought one out over here with that spec I would buy it.  I only got a PS2 last year so still have a few games that I haven't even started and would certainly prefer to play them on the PS3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, &#8220;a certain customer&#8221; would prefer a PS3 with backwards compatibility (even if it is only software emulation).  If they brought one out over here with that spec I would buy it.  I only got a PS2 last year so still have a few games that I haven&#8217;t even started and would certainly prefer to play them on the PS3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4795</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4795</guid>
		<description>I wish they'd bring this out over here. 40Gb just isn't enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish they&#8217;d bring this out over here. 40Gb just isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4794</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/03/scea-we-underestimated-80gb-ps3-demand/#comment-4794</guid>
		<description>I can't help but think this is an overly optimistic view of the situation. But then, he's the head of marketing - so it should be expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but think this is an overly optimistic view of the situation. But then, he&#8217;s the head of marketing - so it should be expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
