<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No games BAFTAs in 2008</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pjmaybe</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6489</link>
		<dc:creator>pjmaybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6489</guid>
		<description>You leave TV's Johnny Milknee out of this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You leave TV&#8217;s Johnny Milknee out of this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6472</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6472</guid>
		<description>Whelks &#62; z-list "celebrities".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whelks &gt; z-list &#8220;celebrities&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjmaybe</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6470</link>
		<dc:creator>pjmaybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6470</guid>
		<description>more effective judging process - ie they're going to get whelks to pick the winners. 

It'd certainly be a more effective method than whatever the hell they used last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more effective judging process - ie they&#8217;re going to get whelks to pick the winners. </p>
<p>It&#8217;d certainly be a more effective method than whatever the hell they used last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6467</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6467</guid>
		<description>"Last year’s awards were marred with difficulties as some titles had to be judged before completion."

Why? Why did they *have to be* judged before completion? Why not just... y'know... only accept games THAT ARE ACTUALLY FINISHED AND ON THE SHELVES into your stupid awards ceremony? Or is that being too sensible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Last year’s awards were marred with difficulties as some titles had to be judged before completion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why? Why did they *have to be* judged before completion? Why not just&#8230; y&#8217;know&#8230; only accept games THAT ARE ACTUALLY FINISHED AND ON THE SHELVES into your stupid awards ceremony? Or is that being too sensible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6465</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/04/17/no-games-baftas-in-2008/#comment-6465</guid>
		<description>Good. They were stupid anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. They were stupid anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
