Comments on: IGN review “rude”, says Haze community dev

By: G1GAHURTZ

G1GAHURTZ — Fri, 23 May 2008 04:17:36 +0000

Game journalists are NOT some sort of external QA!!!

They don’t need to tell people how to make a game, or point out that textures look “PS2″ or that the AI is pathetic or anything else.

If people can’t figure this out for themselves, then they clearly deserve whatever bad reviews they get.

By: absolutezero

absolutezero — Thu, 22 May 2008 22:29:31 +0000

Soooooooo not saying something when presented with the opportunity to do it face to face and then rubbishing it later on in private is now not rude?

Haze may be shit but jesus christ lets find every single way we can to make it look worse at every single fucking chance presented.

By: pjmaybe

pjmaybe — Thu, 22 May 2008 16:21:11 +0000

/still silently waits for Kitt’s review

That should be a goodie!

By: Hero of Canton

Hero of Canton — Thu, 22 May 2008 16:02:11 +0000

They really need to just stay quiet about this now before they embarrass themselves further.

EG’s review is a real savaging, probably more so than the IGN one. Reads like a 2 or 3/10, actually. It’s a great read, actually. Bonus points for having a dig at Assassin’s Creed, too.

By: Whizzo

Whizzo — Thu, 22 May 2008 15:56:34 +0000

Being rude isn’t the same as being wrong.

By: Aretak

Aretak — Thu, 22 May 2008 15:56:13 +0000

That Metacritic score doesn’t include EG’s 4/10 yet either.

By: patlike

patlike — Thu, 22 May 2008 15:53:42 +0000

Not as rude as Eurogamer’s.

By: Psychotext

Psychotext — Thu, 22 May 2008 15:53:32 +0000

“We’ll see how the game is rated by gamers.”

Oh you really don’t want to go down that road…

By: G1GAHURTZ

G1GAHURTZ — Thu, 22 May 2008 15:52:55 +0000

Deh Rude!

Rude bwoy!