May 25th, 2008 @ 20:58
Following Microsoft clamping down on the word “gay” in GamerTags, a couple of gay gaming sites have offered a mixed response to the issue.
“I’ve taken a few deep breathes, run this story over in my mind again and again and yet still return to the same annoying factor,” said LesbianGamers. “Why does ‘gay’ automatically equate to sex or ‘of a sexual nature’ and carry with it such negative and deviant overtones?
“I can understand Microsoft are trying to protect users, but perhaps there needs to be some tabled debate as to what they’re protecting whom from and what they’re perpetuating in the process. Linking ‘gay’ to some negative or sexually explicit content merely fans the fires of homophobia.”
GayGamer’s take was a little more sedate.
“I’m somewhat on the fence with the issue, having played many MMORPGs and seeing the many annoying and disturbing names that can come from idle minds on the internets, and it seems as if Microsoft is putting up the normal “we can’t make exceptions” defense,” said a writer on the site.
“All of this, however, is greatly outweighed by the fact that it is his given name, and despite the connotations it may carry with it, he lives with that name every day.”
Thanks, GamesPolitics.
Del.icio.us | Digg | Share on Facebook
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
And nooooo, you forgot to mention Kaz Hirai, Pat! 
Them twins sending...
May 25th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Still don’t know why they don’t have a pretty exhaustive list of banned words when people set up their gamertags. Would solve all this hassle.
May 25th, 2008 at 9:07 pm
It’s fucking mental. Corporate fascism I say.