<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAPTIVATE08: Hands-on with 1942 and Commando 3</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/04/captivate08-hands-on-with-1942-and-commando-3/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/04/captivate08-hands-on-with-1942-and-commando-3/#comment-12373</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/04/captivate08-hands-on-with-1942-and-commando-3/#comment-12373</guid>
		<description>These two didn't fare too well in their Edge reviews this month - a 4 for 1942 and a 6 for Commando.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These two didn&#8217;t fare too well in their Edge reviews this month - a 4 for 1942 and a 6 for Commando.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
