<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MGS4 is second-highest scoring console exclusive this gen</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/21/mgs4-is-second-highest-scoring-console-exclusive-this-gen/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hero of Canton</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/21/mgs4-is-second-highest-scoring-console-exclusive-this-gen/#comment-15258</link>
		<dc:creator>Hero of Canton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/21/mgs4-is-second-highest-scoring-console-exclusive-this-gen/#comment-15258</guid>
		<description>Galaxy and Orange Box should be 1 and 2, for my money. Though I've not played much of MGS4 yet, admittedly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galaxy and Orange Box should be 1 and 2, for my money. Though I&#8217;ve not played much of MGS4 yet, admittedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wz</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/21/mgs4-is-second-highest-scoring-console-exclusive-this-gen/#comment-15230</link>
		<dc:creator>wz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/21/mgs4-is-second-highest-scoring-console-exclusive-this-gen/#comment-15230</guid>
		<description>Well, maybe I misunderstand something here, but I see this:

1) Grand Theft Auto IV - 98 (PS3 &#38; 360)
2) Super Mario Galaxy - 97 (Wii)
3) BioShock - 96 (360)
3) The Orange Box - 96 (360)
5) Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots - 95 (PS3)
5) The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess - 95 (Wii)

Edit: &lt;strong&gt;exclusive&lt;/strong&gt;. Stupid me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe I misunderstand something here, but I see this:</p>
<p>1) Grand Theft Auto IV - 98 (PS3 &amp; 360)<br />
2) Super Mario Galaxy - 97 (Wii)<br />
3) BioShock - 96 (360)<br />
3) The Orange Box - 96 (360)<br />
5) Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots - 95 (PS3)<br />
5) The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess - 95 (Wii)</p>
<p>Edit: <strong>exclusive</strong>. Stupid me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robo_1</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/21/mgs4-is-second-highest-scoring-console-exclusive-this-gen/#comment-15229</link>
		<dc:creator>Robo_1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/21/mgs4-is-second-highest-scoring-console-exclusive-this-gen/#comment-15229</guid>
		<description>Well earned too.

So much care has been taken with every single part of it, it's a really special experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well earned too.</p>
<p>So much care has been taken with every single part of it, it&#8217;s a really special experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/21/mgs4-is-second-highest-scoring-console-exclusive-this-gen/#comment-15228</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/21/mgs4-is-second-highest-scoring-console-exclusive-this-gen/#comment-15228</guid>
		<description>Not about this game... but has anyone noticed that Metacritic is now using pretty much any little blog to take scores from?  It used to be that you could rely on it sticking to the big sites / magazines but I haven't even heard of 50% of the reviewers they use now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not about this game&#8230; but has anyone noticed that Metacritic is now using pretty much any little blog to take scores from?  It used to be that you could rely on it sticking to the big sites / magazines but I haven&#8217;t even heard of 50% of the reviewers they use now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
