Comments on: Good games don’t need big teams, says Media Molecule

By: frod

frod — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:52:56 +0000

good games don’t need big teams? so this game is on schedule then?

By: patlike

patlike — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:11:22 +0000

The tech chaps are “optimising”, apparently

By: Psychotext

Psychotext — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:09:49 +0000

I’m relying on it.

By: pjmaybe

pjmaybe — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:08:42 +0000

Looks like it

Back to user-created content - sure there’ll always be cock-shaped stuff appearing - if the internet drives a title, then there’s going to be cocks and tits and fannies in it firstly and foremostly before the truly good stuff comes out, and we get quims too…

By: patlike

patlike — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:58:15 +0000

I think we’re having a comment problem.

By: patlike

patlike — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:57:44 +0000

It’s genuinely baseless, though.

By: OrphanageExplosion

OrphanageExplosion — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:57:39 +0000

Put it this way, virtually all of the titles I’ve got a big gamer-shaped boner for this year have some aspect of customisation / user creation in ‘em.

Which is quite apt, as big gamer-shaped boners seem to be synonymous with the concept of user-generated content.

By: pjmaybe

pjmaybe — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:55:18 +0000

I think you meant to add that to the thread about COD5 / 6…

Speculation’s good

By: patlike

patlike — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:50:35 +0000

It’s complete, and I mean complete, speculation. Someone made it up, basically.

By: pjmaybe

pjmaybe — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:46:48 +0000

They do need community-led shareable user-created content though. More important than co-op to new releases IMHO.

Put it this way, virtually all of the titles I’ve got a big gamer-shaped boner for this year have some aspect of customisation / user creation in ‘em.