<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EA&#8217;s Riccitiello wants Boom Blox sequel</title>
	<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/17/eas-riccitiello-wants-boom-blox-sequel/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tonka</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/17/eas-riccitiello-wants-boom-blox-sequel/#comment-20188</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/17/eas-riccitiello-wants-boom-blox-sequel/#comment-20188</guid>
		<description>Dear EA, Please knock Spielbergs name off the cover and 10-20 USDs off the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear EA, Please knock Spielbergs name off the cover and 10-20 USDs off the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that_happy_cat</title>
		<link>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/17/eas-riccitiello-wants-boom-blox-sequel/#comment-19865</link>
		<dc:creator>that_happy_cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/17/eas-riccitiello-wants-boom-blox-sequel/#comment-19865</guid>
		<description>I bought Boom Blox. It was about 90% fun and 9% annoying. The remaining 1% was promise for what the Wii could do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought Boom Blox. It was about 90% fun and 9% annoying. The remaining 1% was promise for what the Wii could do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
